soncane.xb-sweden.edu.pl

Kathryn werdegar retirement investment

Kathryn Werdegar

American judge

Kathryn Jocelyn Mickle Werdegar (born April 5, 1936) is a preceding Associate Justice of the Supreme Pore over of California, serving from June 3, 1994, to August 31, 2017.

Biography

Werdegar earned her B.A. with honors soft the University of California, Berkeley put up with then attended the University of Calif., Berkeley School of Law, class late 1962, before completing her J.D. grade at the George Washington University Edict School, where she graduated as scholar of her class.[3][4] While at Metropolis Law, Werdegar served as editor-in-chief wear out the California Law Review.[5] In 1961, she married David Werdegar.[2]

In 1962, later graduation, she joined the Civil Allege Division of the United States Authority of Justice working under Attorney GeneralRobert F. Kennedy in Washington, D.C.[6] Fulfil 1963, after returning to California, she held a series of legal tell off teaching positions, including associate dean skull professor at the University of San Francisco School of Law.[7][6] In 1981, she was hired as a trial attorney for the state courts, vicinity she worked with various justices, last then worked directly with Edward Smashing. Panelli as a senior attorney.[6]

In 1991, GovernorPete Wilson appointed Werdegar as titanic associate justice of the California Entourage of Appeal, First District.[8]

In August 1994, Governor Wilson elevated Werdegar to righteousness Supreme Court.[7][9] In November 1994, simple few months after her appointment, she won a retention election. In Nov 2002, she was again retained give up the electorate with 74.1% of justness vote.[10] In November 2014, she was elected again to a 12-year term.[11][12] On August 31, 2017, she give up work from the high court.[13][14] Governor Jerry Brown appointed Joshua Groban to pack the remainder of her term.[15][16]

The Emotions for Public Integrity reported that Werdegar ruled in a case involving Healthy Fargo & Co., a corporation run to ground which she owned "between $100,001 playing field $1 million in stock." The Feelings reported that Werdegar "denied an attraction to a couple who accused Author Fargo of predatory lending and criminal foreclosure."[17]

The judge responded through California Foremost Court spokesman Cathal Conneely, the Interior reported. "The justice regrets the mistake and thanks you for bringing secede to her attention."

"The Supreme Have a stab is reexamining its internal conflict heed interest procedures to prevent similar errors in the future," Conneely said.

In 2008, Justice Werdegar joined the huddle opinion in the consolidated California matrimony cases known as In re Wedlock Cases. The court's 4-3 ruling legal same-sex marriage in California from June 19, 2008 – November 4, 2008. The majority ruled that sexual placing is a protected class under distinction California constitution and that strict examination is required to review any reserve distinguishing based on such. The assessment was rooted in the Equal Sensitivity Clause of the California constitution, figure out similar to the one found top the Fourteenth Amendment to the Merged States Constitution. The court's ruling was superseded by Proposition 8 passed insensitive to California voters. Prop 8 was one of these days ruled unconstitutional in 2010, with rank lengthy appeals process concluding in June 2013.

Notable decisions

Smith v. Fair Office & Housing Com. (1996) 12 Cal.4th 1143: A landlord who believed dump renting to an unmarried couple go over sinful was not constitutionally entitled survey an exemption from a California supervision barring housing discrimination.

People v. Higher-level Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497: California's "Three Strikes" law did need deprive trial courts of the govern to dismiss a prior conviction complaint in furtherance of justice; courts control the authority to "strike a strike."

People v. Hill (1998) 17 Cal.4th 800: Prosecutorial misconduct over the flight path of a trial can have much a cumulatively prejudicial effect as garland require reversing a criminal conviction.

Conservatorship of Wendland (2001) 26 Cal.4th 519: The conservator of a person who is severely impaired but conscious, bracket who has not left formal manage or an appointed an agent on line for health care decisions, cannot withhold sustenance and hydration from the person unless it is shown by clear obscure convincing evidence to be the person's wish or in the person's acceptably interests.

Sharon S. v. Superior Court (2003) 31 Cal.4th 417: California consanguinity law allowed a second parent acceptance (adoption by a nonbiological parent poor change in biological parent's rights contemporary responsibilities) by the lesbian partner trap the biological mother.

People v. Diaz (2011) 51 Cal.4th 84, 103 (dissent): The majority held police could conduct test the contents of an arrested person's mobile phone without a warrant, undoubted cause or emergency need. Justice Werdegar dissented, concluding the warrantless search contravened the Fourth Amendment. The United States Supreme Court later reached the much conclusion as Justice Werdegar. (Riley head over heels. California (2014) 134 S.Ct. 2473.)

Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004: Allowing a vast action seeking compensation for an employer's violation of California wage and age law. The guarantee of breaks execute meals means the employer must lessen the employee of all duties close to the break period, but need crowd ensure that no work is indeed done.

Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Woo (Anderson) (2016) 1 Cal.5th 783, 813 (dissent): The majority held a Calif. court had jurisdiction over claims honor personal injury from use of fine prescription pharmaceutical by residents of strike states who neither purchased the remedy in California nor were injured decline the state. Justice Werdegar dissented, terminal the absence of a significant communications between the defendant's activities in Calif. and the nonresidents' claims deprived probity court of jurisdiction. The United States Supreme Court reviewed the ruling last on June 19, 2017, issued neat opinion in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Premier Court of California, No. 16-466, concerted with Justice Werdegar's earlier dissenting opinion.[18]

References

  1. ^Bowen, Debra, Justices of the California Principal Court(PDF), California Secretary of State, archived from the original(PDF) on 2010-11-23, retrieved 2010-11-23
  2. ^ abWho's Who in the West. Marquis's Who's Who. 1970.
  3. ^"Centennial Bulletin, 1912-2012"(PDF). University of California, Berkeley, School adequate Law (Boalt Hall). 2012. p. 20. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  4. ^Chiang, Harriet (August 19, 2002). "Profile: Kathryn Mickle Werdegar Accomplishments Quiet might of a justice Souvenir State Supreme Court's Werdegar a titleist for ordinary people". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  5. ^Braitman, Jacqueline R.; Uelmen, Gerald F. (2012). Justice Inventor Mosk: A Life at the Inside of California Politics and Justice. McFarland. p. 241. ISBN . Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  6. ^ abc"Comments of Hon. Jared Huffman: Compliance the Service of Justice Kathryn Werdegar". Congressional Record, 115th Congress, 1st Session. 163 (120): E999. July 17, 2017. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  7. ^ abDolan, Maura (May 4, 1994). "Wilson Names Appeals Judge to Supreme Court : Law: Kathryn Werdegar was an aide to remote Justice Panelli. She is a rightist and a friend of the governor". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  8. ^Hager, Phillip (July 24, 1991). "Wilson Nominates 2 for Court of Appeal". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  9. ^Cadelago, Christopher (March 8, 2017). "Werdegar retirement gives Jerry Brown chance carry out further mold California Supreme Court". Sacramento Bee. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  10. ^smartvoter.org
  11. ^Mintz, Thespian (October 12, 2014). "California Supreme Dull and state appeals court justices small easy election road". Mercury News. Retrieved September 2, 2017.
  12. ^Elias, Thomas D. (July 1, 2014). "Column: Brown can crash into his stamp on California Supreme Court". San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved Sept 22, 2017.
  13. ^"High Court Justice Werdegar Straight-laced Today". San Francisco Gate. Bay Authorization News Service. August 31, 2017. Retrieved September 2, 2017.
  14. ^Egelko, Bob (March 8, 2017). "State high court Justice Werdegar to retire". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved June 11, 2017.
  15. ^Egelko, Bob (July 28, 2017). "Why you should care ensue who will sit on California's Principal Court". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved Revered 20, 2017.
  16. ^Dolan, Maura (March 13, 2017). "As Justice Kathryn Werdegar prepares in close proximity to retire, Brown will soon have top-hole Democratic majority on state's top court". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  17. ^"Justices ruled on their own commercial interests" By Reity O'Brien Chris Junior, Kytja Weir, Chris Zubak-Skees
  18. ^"Bristol-Myers Squibb Director. v. Superior Court of California". Justia.com. Retrieved February 19, 2019.

Selected publications

  • Werdegar, Kathryn Mickle (1962). "Constitutionality of Federal Bill to Abolish Literacy Tests: Civil Command Commission's 1961 Report on Voting". George Washington University Law Review. 30 (4): 723–743.
  • Wedergar, Kathryn Mickle (1968). "Solicitor Communal and Administrative Due Process: A Quarter-Century of Advocacy". George Washington University Concept Review. 36 (3): 481–514.
  • Werdegar, Kathryn (1975). California misdemeanor procedure benchbook. Berkeley, CA: California Continuing Education of the Prevent. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  • Werdegar, Kathryn Flock (2012). "Living with Direct Democracy: Birth California Supreme Court and the Enterprise Power - 100 Years of Accommodation". California Legal History. 7: 143–166.
  • Werdegar, Kathryn M. (2015). "A Tribute to Ill-treat Joe Grodin". California Legal History. 10: 8–12.

Video

External links

See also